Is the Security Prosperity Partnership a Precursor for a North American Union Uniting the USA, Mexico and Canada?

"Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none." --- Thomas Jefferson

Acts 17:26-28: And He made from one [common origin, one source, one blood] all nations of men to settle on the face of the earth, having definitely determined [their] allotted periods of time and the fixed boundaries of their habitation (their settlements, lands, and abodes), So that they should seek God, in the hope that they might feel after Him and find Him, although He is not far from each one of us. For in Him we live and move and have our being; as even some of your [own] poets have said, for we are also His offspring.

I am continually amazed at how informed people are when it comes to non-issues, like stories about Michael Vick, Brittney Spears, Kobe Bryant wanting to be traded from the LA Lakers, and the World Series. But in regards to serious issues that concern the well-being of our nation, people tend to have a glazed over, glassy-eyed, deer stunned in the headlights look on their faces. The EU, Pan-African Union, Mediterranean Union, Pan-Asian Union or a North American Union (also known as NAU, Security and Prosperity Partnership or SPP) is the regionalization of nations? What do you mean? Or you may see the Chicken little-type Christians on the other end of the spectrum who think that some world ruler is going to emerge and put a microchip in everyone’s forehead or right hand at any given time. It’s sad that we have reduced ourselves to a society of entertainment and/or fanaticism, and the only form of quasi-credible news that most people absorb are talking points on the news headlines. These are talking points parrots, whatever Rush Limbaugh, Tavis Smiley or Sean Hannity says is what everyone else repeats and follows. The listeners have very little discernment and in most cases, they don’t know the entire story. But since a fancy guy is in a nice suit on television saying something, then it is assumed that he/she knows what is right.

The recent Quebec Security and Prosperity Partnership Summit held at Montebello, Quebec drew attention to a proposed merger of the U.S., Mexico and Canada. The event, attended by President George Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexico's President Felipe Calderon drew hundreds opposed to the plan. The United States of America as you know it is not going to exist if our elected officials continue to have their way. Folks, I have compiled the information for you. I have done the research and the homework for you. All I ask is that you review it, check behind me, and make a decision about this issue. You can no longer afford to sit on the sidelines. YOU MUST GET INVOLVED!!!!!!!!!!! You are going to read quotes and articles by some important people who desire an NAU or SPP, which is a merging of nations (USA, Mexico and Canada), military, currency, social security systems, roads, etc. As you can see in the above mentioned Scripture (Acts 17:26), God did not intend for us to have a borderless world. Merging three neighboring countries will eventually destroy more of America’s good paying jobs. Don’t take my word for it, because the people who are implementing this agenda don’t work a 9-5 job like you. They are wealthy and can live off of their many investments. This is a different breed of people who have another agenda in mind whether you and I agree with it or not. Let’s review the information, get informed and make a sound decision so that we can act. Fair enough?

March 28, 2005: Rafael Fernandez de Castro and Rosanna Fuentes Berain, editors of the CFR’s Foreign Affairs en Español, urge the SPP to work toward a “true North American Union.” “[The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America should be] working toward an eventual goal of a true North American union.” (“Hands Across North America,” New York Times, March 28, 2005)

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox told Larry King Live that he and President Bush had agreed to "create a new regional currency in the Americas." (See the story here)

Fox was asked by a listener what he felt about the possibility of having a Latin America united with one currency. According to the CNN transcript, "Fox answered in the affirmative, indicating it was a long-term plan. He admitted he and President Bush had agreed to pursue the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas--a free trade zone extending throughout the Western Hemisphere, suggesting part of the plan was to institute eventually a regional currency."

In his autobiographical book "Revolution of Hope," former Mexican president Vicente Fox admits he pushed for a European Union-style merger of the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

On page 101, Fox writes:

"I proposed a ’NAFTA Plus’ plan to President Bush and Canada’s Prime Minister Jean Chrétien to move us toward a single continental economic union, modeled on the European example." "Bush shot the idea down." Fox continued. "The White House sent word that life would be easier if this Mexican cowboy [Vicente Fox] would stop raising hackles with his talk of a North American Union."

CNN You Tube Video: Lou Dobbs Slams CFR & North American Union

CNN You Tube Video: Lou Dobbs and the North American Union Orwellian Brave New World

You Tube Video: The Amero - North American Currency

Robert Pastor, Vice-Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) task force that produced the 2001 report “Building a North American Union” and book “Toward a North American Community,” called for the creation of a North American Union. It would perfect the defects Pastor believes limits the progress of the European Union. Much of Pastor’s thinking appears aimed at limiting the power and sovereignty of the United States as we enter this new super-regional entity. Pastor has also called for the creation of a new currency which he has coined the “Amero,” a currency that is proposed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar, and the Mexican peso.

(Author’s thought: Why are we not hearing much about this? We hear about terrorism and terrorist behavior everyday on the news, but merging our nation with two weaker nations barely makes the news. Something is wrong here. Yes, there is a government website about it, but it is full of buzz words and political dribble. But don’t worry folks, BG Street is here to filter through all of the politics and give you the “real deal.”

Analysts have theorized that a coming dollar collapse will set the stage for creating the “Amero” as a North American currency to replace the dollar. This may also explain why nothing is substantively and conveniently being done to secure the US borders from illegal immigration. Just a thought.)

Robert Pastor also wishes to see the creation of a North American Parliamentary Group to make sure the U.S. Congress does not impede progress in the envisioned North American Union. In 2005, he also said, “The best way to secure the United States is not at our borders with Mexico and Canada but at the borders of North America as a whole.” This goal, he said, “we hope to accomplish by 2010.”

(Author’s thought: Congress makes the laws for this nation, not the President or any other group, agency or council [foreign or domestic]. Article I, Section 8, of the US Constitution states that Congress shall have the power "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations." Congress may not abdicate or transfer to others these Constitutional powers. In addition, "Trade Promotion Authority," which transfers the establishment of trade policy from Congress to the Executive branch of government is Unconstitutional, as well.

International trade agreements generally sound wonderful on the surface, but in reality they serve to benefit the transnational corporations, and such agreements are diminishing America's economic self-sufficiency and are continuing the upward trajectory of exporting higher paying jobs. This outsourcing impoverishes American families, undermines American communities, and diminishes America's capacity for economic self-reliance. I am not embracing an isolationist’s view, but I am embracing the ideology that we should take care of America first, and then we can help our friends.)

CNN’s Lou Dobbs touched a nerve with the American public when he declared, “The Bush administration’s open-borders policy and its decision to ignore the enforcement of this country’s immigration laws is part of a broader agenda. President Bush signed a formal agreement that will end the United States as we know it, and he took the step without approval from either the U.S. Congress or the people of the United States.”

In short, the SPP agenda would merge the three countries inside a common “security perimeter,” essentially erasing our current national borders. The SPP’s designers commend the European Union’s open migration policy and advise that we likewise merge our customs, immigration, and border enforcement agencies with those of Canada and Mexico to facilitate the flow of peoples and goods. They also propose a North American passport. These and other measures aimed at continuing political and economic integration of our three countries, they say, will enhance our security and prosperity.

Dr. C.M. Pierce, Harvard University, said in a speech before teachers in 1973, "Every child in America entering school at the age of five is INSANE because he comes to school with certain allegiances toward our founding fathers, toward our elected officials, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being, toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity. It's up to you as teachers to make all of these SICK children well, by creating the international child of the future."

These remarks make it easy to see that socialists regard true religion and patriotism to be symptoms of mental illness, qualifying the "mentally abnormal" for ever intensifying psychotherapy until the "anti-social" tendencies are either cured or...... The book 1984 is an accurate prophesy of what's to come. "You will learn to love Big Brother."

(Author’s thought: The thought of respecting the sovereignty of your own country is threatening to these people. Why? Because a truly sovereign country is not controlled by anyone but the nation’s citizens. That is why these think tanks and policy makers are packaging this stuff so carefully, making it seem as though this is for the benefit of the people. What a joke! The people who want to regionalize nations and continents are doing all that they can to dismantle constitutions, laws and loyalty to the nation state.)

CNN anchor Lou Dobbs lamented: “For the first time in our history, Americans aren’t dreaming of a better life for their children; they are desperately hoping that their children won’t be forced into a lower standard of living and a lower quality of life.”

Former Federal Reserve board member Alan Blinder recently predicted the potential loss of as many as 40 million American jobs to outsourcing. How can this be? One need look no further than government action, especially the drag of taxation and regulation that is not borne by America’s foreign competitors. This is a key point! So American corporations look for any competitive edge that they can use: lower labor costs.

Leading SPP advocates publicly deny that their integration plans will bring about a centralized EU-style government that will override national, state, and local governance. Privately, however, in their speeches and writings, they acknowledge that this is precisely what they are constructing.

May 17, 2005: The Council on Foreign Relations’ Independent Task Force on North America proposes that the SPP establish by 2010 a North American economic and security community and lay the groundwork for a virtual open borders policy throughout North America. “The Task Force offers a detailed and ambitious set of proposals that build on the recommendations adopted by the three governments at the Texas summit of March 2005. The Task Force’s central recommendation is establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter.... WHAT WE SHOULD DO BY 2010. Lay the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America. The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America.” (Building a North American Community, CFR Task Force Report, May 17, 2005)

March 23, 2005: President Bush refers to the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America as a “union.”“As to what kind of union might there be, I see one based upon free trade, that would then entail commitment to markets and democracy, transparency, rule of law.” (President George W. Bush, press conference at SPP launch, March 23, 2005)

"I do not favor the North American Union. It was a pretty stupid thing to get involved with three years ago. I don't necessarily remember what I was thinking at the time, but I can speak for now and I do not favor a North American Union." - Oklahoma City Mayor Mick Cornett

Mexican President Felipe Calderon, in his 2007 State of the Union address, denounces U.S. border security and declares, “Mexico does not end at the border,... wherever there is a Mexican, Mexico is there.”

July 18, 1993: Henry Kissinger stresses NAFTA’s importance as a framework for future international restructuring. “[The proposed NAFTA agreement is] the architecture of a new international system.” (Henry Kissinger, former Secretary of State, “With NAFTA, U.S. Finally Creates a New World Order,” Los Angeles Times, July 18, 1993)

March 14, 2005: The Council on Foreign Relations’ Independent Task Force on the Future of North America proposes the creation of a North American community to enhance security and prosperity for all North Americans. “When the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States meet in Texas on March 23, they will be representing countries whose futures are shared as never before.... The ever-deepening integration of North America promises enormous benefits for its citizens....We propose the creation by 2010 of a community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity for all North Americans....The boundaries of the community would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter. Within this area, the movement of people and products would be legal, orderly, and safe.” (Creating a North American Community, CFR Task Force Report, March 14, 2005)

October 15, 2004: Richard N. Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), launches a task force to study the extent of North American integration
after 10 years of NAFTA. “The Council has launched an independent task force on the future of North America to examine regional integration since the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement ten years ago.” (CFR News Release, October 15, 2004)

NAFTA highways: “The North American Council should develop an integrated continental plan for transportation and infrastructure that includes new North American highways and high-speed rail corridors.” Testimony by Robert Pastor before a subcommittee of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, June 9, 2005.

It's not about transportation . . . It's about revenue.

The "NAFTA/NAU Highway"

"I don't think the general public is aware of all the information they need to know . . ."— Texas Representative Robert "Robby" Cook (July 4, 2004)

"in your lifetime most existing roads will have tolls"— Transportation Commissioner Ric Williamson (October 11, 2004)

It's shocking just how few Texans know about this massive super-highway-rail-utility project launched by Governor Perry in 2002. Ten vehicle lanes, six rail tracks, utilities, pipelines, state concessions (gas stations, restaurants, motels, stores, warehouses, etc.) all on 4,000 miles of toll roads that will consume more than one-half million acres of Texas.

CLICK THIS LINK AND WATCH THIS VIDEO: TRUTH BE TOLLED: TTC SPECIAL EDITION

“The NAC [a new ‘North American Commission’] should develop an integrated continental plan for transportation and infrastructure that includes new North American highways and high-speed rail corridors.” American University Professor Robert Pastor, a key architect of what critics have dubbed the “North American Union,” included this recommendation in his January/February 2004 Foreign Affairs article entitled, “North America’s Second Decade,” a reference to the second decade after NAFTA.

“The ultimate goal is not simply a superhighway, but an integrated North American Union — complete with a currency, a cross-national bureaucracy, and virtually borderless travel within the Union.... It sounds like a recipe for transnational socialism and the further destruction of the U.S. economy. Terrorists surely dream of a borderless North America, where they can move freely from country to country unmolested.... We must demand that American sovereignty be protected.” Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) offered this assessment of the planned NAFTA trade corridors via video to the Coalition to Block the North American Union’s August 20, 2007 news conference in Ottawa, Canada.

“I think the Bush administration has a master plan to erase all borders and to have a super-government in North America. There’s talk about mega-ports down in Mexico and superhighway toll roads built with foreign money right into the heart of America.... I am convinced that the plan to create a North American Union is what is going on.... I believe
the Mexican truck demonstration is part of it.” Teamsters president James P. Hoffa told WorldNetDaily that the push to give Mexican trucks access to our highways is part of a larger plan.


Are We Close To Becoming Another EU? Compare These Facts

The European Union (EU) began as a Coal and Steel Free Trade Agreement in 1951.
The NAU began as NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994.

Then the EU morphed into the European Economic Community (EEC).
Before the U.S. Congress, CFR member Dr. Robert Pastor calls for a North American Community.

Once the EEC became established, it then morphed into the Common Market.
Now that NAFTA is established, it has morphed into the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP).

Britain joined the so called 'Common Market' in January, 1973 which then morphed into the European Union (EU).
The Security and Prosperity Partnership, begun in March 2005, is morphing into the North American Union (NAU).

The EU already has a single currency called the Euro.
The plan is for our single currency to be called the Amero.

"Those ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it"

To understand what happens when you give up your national sovereignty, you MUST watch this 43 minute video titled: The Real Face of the European Union.

The United States must "act for ourselves and not for others." FAREWELL ADDRESS (1796) George Washington

Steps are Being Made to Quietly Merge Our Nations Together

Social Security billions could go to Mexicans
Critics say benefits would lure illegals to U.S. while giving employers marginal help

An organization of retirees has announced the release, after three years of arguments and a Freedom of Information request, by the Social Security Administration of a copy of the first known public copy of the U.S.-Mexico Social Security Totalization Agreement.

The TREA Senior Citizens League said the document reveals what was expected, a huge threat to the future of Social Security, because any Mexican worker who has as little as 18 months of employment history in the United States could end up qualifying for some Social Security retirement benefits.

The US military Bullying Canadian Civilians

Connie Fogal, Leader of the Canadian Action Party, says, "So much for conspiracy theories! Now we have the ugly truth fully exposed. The US military really does now run Canada." The US military is on Canadian soil forbidding the Municipality of Papineauville from renting a hall to the Council of Canadians who planned a public meeting to be held the day before the Three Amigos meet in Montebello, Quebec, Canada August 20, 21 2007 to plan their next moves in the dismantling of their respective countries of Canada, USA and Mexico.

Mexican troops defiant: 'Border? What border?'
Military 'crosses into America 216 times during past 9 years'

The Mexican military has little regard for the border as troops have entered the United States 216 times over nine years, according to a Department of Homeland Security document and a map of incursions.

California's Inland Valley Daily Bulletin says U.S. officials claim the border-crossings are designed to help foreign drug and human smugglers gain safe access into American territory.

Critics decry Mexican dual citizenshipFox government wants permanent right for immigrants to divide their loyalties

The Mexican government is planning to change its constitution to establish a permanent right for those born in Mexico and living in other nations to obtain dual citizenship, a move criticized by some U.S. immigration experts as counterproductive to American interests.

The changes, reports the Santa Barbara News Press, would allow Mexicans naturalized abroad to participate in their native country's election process, as well as own land.

Canada-US troop deal 'close'

The Canadian defense minister says Canada and the United States are close to an agreement that would allow American and Canadian soldiers to cross each other's borders in the event of a terrorist attack.

"I Would Fire Upon U.S. Citizens..."

The RESISTER has confirmed that US Navy SEAL platoons, including SEAL Team Six, Marine combat veterans stationed at Twenty-Nine Palms, CA, and Marine basic trainees at Camp Pendelton, CA, have been administered a questionnaire asking, among other things, if they would "...fire upon US citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the US government."

Now this is totally a travesty for the USA. Our own military has no concept of law or history. What is the Second of the Constitution all about? The right to bear arms is what allowed those brave souls who traveled from the Old World to the New World to sever their ties from tyrannical British rule. Gun confiscation/banning helped Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin and other despots in World History. Don’t be a mental slave, folks. Learn history, get educated and do the right thing. Any soldier (and his commanding superiors) who fires upon US citizens who stand upon their Constitutional rights should have a serious penalty to pay, with no leniency. They are training us; rather, they are dumbbing much of the population down. It’s a very sad thing!!!!!!!

(Author’s conclusion: A North American Union is not good for America. Americans and Canadians who know about it don’t want it, yet Mexico does want it. Why is that? Think about it in natural terms, America is 90% strong, Canada is 60% strong, and Mexico is 30% strong. If the merger of these three nations takes place then everyone will be 60%. Understand? America’s strengths get watered down with Canadian and Mexican weaknesses. Canada probably evens out with pluses and minuses, but Mexico gets the best deal, because they can’t go anywhere but up. America continues to lose job to low labor countries, and we continue to transition from a production nation to a service economy, i.e., selling goods and services rather than producing them. We have fallen from a mighty long way since the Industrial Revolution. Wake up, folks. The concept of losing national sovereignty isn’t that hard to grasp. This is very serious! The country that we are living in today is looking down the barrel of a gun unless you get informed, get involved, and stand for the truth.)