Is Barak Obama a Sound Biblical Choice for President?
Well, since none of the answers that I have heard concerning Senator Obama as a sound Biblical and Constitutional candidate, I am referring the readers to one of my most recent articles. Follow this hyperlink and read my unbiased article about the political issues, not the candidates. Then do a comparison with the candidates, the law, and Bible principles. Please DO NOT inject your opinion, feelings, your race or experiences into the equation. We are only looking for the truth. This will ensure that everything is objective and that nothing will be subjected to pride, prejudice, emotions or nepotism. Remember, we are supposed to be choosing a candidate to lead this nation. This shouldn’t be a popularity contest or a racial pride marathon. Let’s employ principle and integrity, and not just support “a candidate.”
Barack Obama on the issues based on these stances:(Click on topic for excerpt & citation)
Racial equality good for America as a whole: Favors topic 2Supports affirmative action in colleges and government: Strongly Favors topic 2America's race and class problems are intertwined: Favors topic 2
Opposes gay marriage; supports civil union & gay equality: Favors topic 3Marriage not a human right; non-discrimination is: Favors topic 3Include sexual orientation in anti-discrimination laws: Favors topic 3NO on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage: Strongly Favors topic 3
Listening to evangelicals bridges major political fault line: Favors topic 4Religious concerns ok, if translated into universal values: Opposes topic 4NO on recommending Constitutional ban on flag desecration: Opposes topic 4
Strongly Opposes topic 9:Mandatory Three Strikes sentencing laws
Strongly Favors topic 12:Illegal immigrants earn citizenship
Fair trade should have tangible benefits for US: Strongly Opposes topic 13Tax incentives to create jobs at home instead of offshore: Opposes topic 13NO on implementing CAFTA for Central America free-trade: Strongly Opposes topic 13 YES on free trade agreement with Oman: Strongly Favors topic 13
Strongly Favors topic 14:The Patriot Act harms civil liberties
Favors topic 15:Expand the armed forces
First bill ever passed was campaign finance reform: Strongly Favors topic 16Lobbyist influence comes from access, not money: Favors topic 16YES on establishing the Senate Office of Public Integrity: Favors topic 16 NO on allowing some lobbyist gifts to Congress: Strongly Favors topic 16
Favors topic 17:US out of Iraq
As far as further military action is concerned, Obama has been upfront about how he would deal with Iran, arguing that he would not rule out the use of force and supports surgical strikes of alleged nuclear sites in the country if diplomacy (coercion) fails. To put it bluntly, none of the front running Democrats is opposed to Bush's dubious "war on terror" or his bullying of Iran. They support his aggression in principle but simply believe a Democratic presidency could handle the job more astutely. The Democrats are not going to fundamentally alter U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Simply put, the troops aren’t coming home! Surprise! The original war effort has now escalated from Afghanistan to Iraq, and now over to Iran or Syria shortly. The initial $87 Billion for the war effort has mushroomed to over $1 Trillion. Now, the President is asking the Congress to authorize more money for the war. I thought the Democratically-controlled Congress wanted to bring the troops home? If so, why are they approving so much more money? Here’s a little hint for you…….the troops aren’t coming home. Don’t hold your breath. They are building permanent bases over there. So they are just selling you feel-good, patriotic ads. Enjoy!
Strongly Favors topic 18:Replace coal & oil with alternatives
Favors topic 19:Drug use is immoral: enforce laws against it
According to his stance on issues, Barack Obama is a Hard-Core Liberal.
- A "hard-core libertarian" would answer both personal and economic questions to minimize government involvement.
- A "hard-core liberal" would answer personal questions to minimize government involvement, but would answer economic questions to include government intervention.
- A "hard-core conservative" would answer personal questions to include government intervention, but would answer economic questions to minimize government involvement.
- A "hard-core populist" would answer both personal and economic questions with proposals that include government intervention.
Now go back and Follow this hyperlink and re-read my unbiased article about the political issues, not the candidates. Again I ask you according to principle: Is Barak Obama a sound Biblical and Constitutional choice for President?
No comments:
Post a Comment